Modern Investor - For Professional Investors

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

PassiveBeat: will BlackRock's quant swap pay off?

PassiveBeat: will BlackRock's quant swap pay off?

Cyclicality can sometimes surprise, despite its inherently repetitive nature. It is odd, for example, to find the world’s largest asset manager emulating a late, unlamented fund house.

Last week, BlackRock announced that $30 billion of its assets under management,  11% of its total active equity assets, would be shifting away from traditional active management towards a quantitative approach.

‘Traditional methods of equity investing are being reshaped by massive advances in technology and data sciences,’ explained Mark Wiseman, global head of active equities at BlackRock.

‘At the same time, client preferences are shifting, focusing not just on outcomes but on how both performance and fees impact value.

‘The active equity industry needs to change. Asset managers who simply use the same techniques and tools from the past will limit their ability to generate alpha and deliver on client expectations,’ he added.

All change please

Wiseman claimed that in embracing quants the firm was ‘revitalizing our active equity capabilities by harnessing the power of human and machine to efficiently and consistently deliver investment performance to our clients.’ 

The plans will have an immediate price for BlackRock. As well as paying out $25 million during the first quarter of 2017 in severance and accelerated compensation expenses – several managers will be leaving the company as part of the process – BlackRock expects client fees from the affected funds to drop by $30 million a year. Under its new Advantage range of products, expense ratios will fall by between 16 and 81 basis points.

BlackRock believes the pricing and performance of this Advantage suite will ultimately attract inflows to offset the impact on its revenues, but skeptics may be interested in the example of UK asset manager Scottish Widows Investment Partnership (Swip) which made a similar move with mixed results. 

OK Computer

In 2012, Swip ushered more than half of its equity fund managers out of the door as it sought to revive its fortunes with quants. At the time, Swip managing director Dean Buckley characterized the move more in terms of risk mitigation than return enhancement.

‘We remain committed to active fund management in those markets where we have confidence that we can generate strong investment performance and build long-term, valuable relationships with clients,’ he remarked. ‘However, for some of our clients, a lower-risk approach to investment is more appropriate for their needs.’

Yet Swip funds continued to feature more prominently in various lists of serial underperformers than in the sales charts.

Swip’s defenders may perhaps insist that the quant migration was interrupted by Aberdeen’s acquisition of the firm in 2013 – at which point Swip ran £52 billion in quantitative equities, worth 40% of its assets under management – so it is unfair to judge it a failure. With the former Swip strategies now all merged away, nobody can know how successful those quant approaches would have been.

BlackRock will of course hope that its own quant conversion registers as more than a footnote in investment history. It has inevitably been cast as evidence of active’s capitulation to passive, but as in Swip’s case that isn’t quite right.

Faith no more

Rather, as Ritholtz Wealth Management chief executive Josh Brown argued at a Citywire’s first US domestic conference last week, it’s a transition from the ‘faith-based’ investing of human stockpickers to something more systematic.

This, he said, was driven by investors’ increasing preference for back-tested approaches and repeatable processes. And it was not confined to retail investors, he noted: quantitative hedge funds like Citadel are proving considerably more appealing than ‘swashbucklers’ in the Pershing Square mould.

These trends were almost certainly more in BlackRock’s thoughts than Swip’s ill-fated quant experiment five years ago.

Its emphasis on lower costs is certainly to be welcomed, especially if BlackRock’s quant team can maintain its impressive record: 90% of their mandates outperformed their respective benchmarks or peer-group median over the five years to the end of 2016.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Events
  • Citywire Alternative Ucits Retreat 2017

    Citywire Alternative Ucits Retreat 2017

  • Citywire Milan 2017

    Citywire Milan 2017

  • Citywire Paris 2017

    Citywire Paris 2017

  • Citywire Deutschland 2017

    Citywire Deutschland 2017

  • Citywire DACH 2016

    Citywire DACH 2016

  • Citywire Italy 2016

    Citywire Italy 2016

  • Citywire Milan 2016

    Citywire Milan 2016

  • Citywire Alt Ucits 2016

    Citywire Alt Ucits 2016

  • Citywire Berlin 2016

    Citywire Berlin 2016

  • Citywire Switzerland 2016

    Citywire Switzerland 2016

  • Citywire Amsterdam 2016

    Citywire Amsterdam 2016

  • Citywire Montreux 2016

    Citywire Montreux 2016

  • Citywire Deutschland 2016

    Citywire Deutschland 2016

  • Citywire Latin America 2016

    Citywire Latin America 2016

  • Citywire Milan 2016

    Citywire Milan 2016

  • Citywire Munich 2016

    Citywire Munich 2016

  • Citywire Paris Alt Ucits 2016

    Citywire Paris Alt Ucits 2016

  • Citywire Zurich Alt Ucits 2016

    Citywire Zurich Alt Ucits 2016