Modern Investor - For Professional Investors

Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

ERAFP CEO: legal action against a company is a last resort

ERAFP CEO: legal action against a company is a last resort
Legal action against a company you're invested in should be a last resort for institutions that want to see change.

This is according to Philippe Desfosses, CEO of the €23 billion pension scheme for French civil servants ERAFP and former Modern Investor cover star.

Desfosses spoke to Modern Investor following the news that Norway's sovereign wealth fund is about to sue Volkswagen over the car maker's emissions scandal.

‘To engage legal action against a company you invested in might sound bizarre since if successful you will get money but increase in some way the ordeal of the company. It is the reason why it is so important to engage businesses and to draw red lines as soon as an issue is detected,' he said.

‘The right way to protect your investments is to set up an engagement policy, as ERAFP did a few years ago, and vote accordingly in the annual general meeting. The natural complement to that is a dialogue with the senior management in non-confrontational manner. Legal action is a last-resort move.’

Because institutional investors have a fiduciary duty to protect the assets that are the ultimate guarantee of the promises they have delivered, they should already have set engagement policies, Desfosses believes.

'Most of them will do so and the pressure will increase on the management of companies. Those managements should not forget that they are agents, and that institutional investors are the owners on behalf of their contributors or clients.’

Speaking to Modern Investor , Desfosses said there is no trade-off between performance and ESG results. 'Integrating ESG factors is the most efficient way to invest in sustainable business models.’

He added that it is important to ensure that SRI approaches are applied across all assets. ‘Some asset owners claim that 5% are managed according to SRI criteria. But what does it say about the 95% that are left? Does it mean that 95% are managed in an irresponsible way?’

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Events
  • Citywire Venice 2018: closing day event photos

    Citywire Venice 2018: closing day event photos

  • Citywire Venice 2018: photos from day one of the selector event

    Citywire Venice 2018: photos from day one of the selector event

  • Citywire Madrid 2018: photos from the fund selector event

    Citywire Madrid 2018: photos from the fund selector event

  • Citywire Luxembourg 2018: photos from the selector event

    Citywire Luxembourg 2018: photos from the selector event

  • Citywire Zurich 2018: photos from the event and panel session

    Citywire Zurich 2018: photos from the event and panel session

  • Citywire Global New Ideas 2018: photos from the final sessions

    Citywire Global New Ideas 2018: photos from the final sessions

  • Global New Ideas 2018: photos from the opening day

    Global New Ideas 2018: photos from the opening day